PDCRE

SMALLHOLDER CASH
AND EXPORT CROP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

 
contact
site map

 

Project > Benefits, Justifications and Risks

print

Home

Project

  • Introduction
  • Poverty context
  • Strategy framework
  • Sub-sector context
  • The institutional context
  • Project area
  • Implementation
  • Description and activities
  • Organization
  • Benefits
  • Assurances
  • Amendment

  • Tea component
  • Information

  • Acronym and abbreviation
  • Glossary
  • Maps
  • Pictures
  • Archive (previous news)
  • The team
  • Download
  • Benefits, justifications and risks

    Risk and risk moderation measures included in the project design

    The main risks of non-performance of the project components are indicated below.

    a) Smallholder tea development.

    With respect to the Nshili sub-component the following risk factors are important

    • delays and interferences with the distribution of the OCIR plantation to poor smallholders, and in particular to the women head of households and survivors of genocide living in the area. This would have a negative impact on the main project objective, delay the construction of the tea factory, slow down production of green leaves, and affect the financial sustainability of the Nsili Tea Company;
    • the yield of green leaves obtained by the smallholder beneficiaries of the OCIR-Thé estate distribution is less than expected, possibly due to sub-optimal application of fertilisers. This may reduce the financial viability of the tea factory during the first years of operation and delay the acquisition of the, shares by the cooperatives;
    • delays in granting the personnalité juridique to the primary societies of smallholder tea planters. This will delay the establishment of the Nshili Tea Company and the construction of the tea factory.

    Risk moderation measures include:

    • GoR to attach top priority to the distribution of the OCIR-Thé industrial estate to smallholders; IFAD will withhold disbursement of funds for any other activity in tea development (in both Nshili and Mushibi) until the land distribution is completed and formalised, all individual beneficiary HHs identified, their qualification as IFAD target group verified, IFAD is satisfied that the number of women head of HHs being given user rights to tea plots is according to project policy, the primary societies formed and granted personnalité juridique so that they can acquire shares in the Nshili Tea Company and primary societies;
    • The projected yields of green leaves (8 t/ha) is perfectly possible in the area, provided adequate quantities of fertilisers are applied. Yields obtained by the cooperative plots that supply SORWATHE in a similar area have been significantly higher when correct amount of fertilisers have been applied. Nevertheless, the project includes the expansion of the area grown to tea by smallholders in Nshili by 200 ha, which would offset up to 20% shortfall of the projected yields.

    With respect to development of smallholder tea plantations in Mushubi, the risk is connected to delays in construction of a factory to process the crop there.

    Risk moderation measures include:

    • Government commitment to undertake the timely construction of the factory with other sources of funds, in case IFAD and BADEA are not in a position to support the factory project with the necessary complementary funding at the required time.

    b) The coffee diversification component.

    The following risk factors affect the performance of the coffee diversification programme:

    • delays in organising suitable smallholder coffee growers primary societies in four different areas suitable for high value coffee production, leading to establishing the CPMCCs over a longer period than three years, which would increase the cost of the management contract for the enterprises, requiring an extension of the contract with TWIN for the management of the enterprises;
    • poor performance of TWIN and or other service providers under the coffee diversification component;
    • political interference with the management of the CPMCCs and/or with the management of the primary societies;
    • lack of success in sufficiently improving the quality of the coffee produced and processed; and
    • exceptionally bad climatic conditions.

    Risk moderation measures include:

    • close monitoring and supervision of cooperative formation and training activities;
    • GOR commitment to defend the autonomy of primary societies from political interference, and close monitoring of their performance, including the transparency and democracy of their decision making processes; and
    • close monitoring of the agricultural research activities required to back up coffee quality improvement.

    c) The new cash and export crops component.

    Risk will vary depending on the crop. Oversupply of a specific product in the domestic market, or in a particular export market may occur. Outbreaks of unforeseen pest or disease may severely damage production and/or increase costs beyond profitable operations. Not enough new opportunities may be identified to absorb all the funds allocated to this component. Risk moderation measures will be elaborated during project implementation on a case by case basis.

     

    previous

    next

    © 2005 - Terms of use

    top