The sub-sector context
Moderating the worse effects of globalization: the Fair Trade
movement
Over the last decade, several organizations in
the developed world have responded to the challenge of globalization
by introducing innovative marketing methods and market access channels
for producers in poor countries, in an attempt to show that globalization
can be turned to the advantage of producers in poor countries and
of consumers in rich countries as well. These organizations have
created the Fair-Trade network. The network includes
non-profit and minimum-profit organizations, motivated by the objective
of promoting sustainable development of producers’ communities.
They act as intermediaries with respect to commercial companies
that view long-term economic growth and stability in producing countries
as a necessary condition of expanding business and prosperity for
all.
The thrust of the FT organizations is in the specialty
markets where products are sold under an internationally accepted
label that guarantees origin, quality, and eventually other features
such as organic production, and command a significant price differential.
These markets are currently expanding at over 12% per annum, but
are still only a small share of the overall market.
A major thrust of Fair Trade strategy is to exploit
the opportunities provided by the diversification of consumer demand
in favor of quality products, and to ensure that the extra trading
margins in these markets are paid to producers and used for development
by the communities of producers. Currently, Fair Trade (FT) organizations
are established in 16 highly developed countries. In each country,
there are FT trading partners and national federations. The FT network
works with 10 products; namely, coffee, tea, cocoa, bananas, honey,
mangoes, sugar, rice, orange juice, and cut flowers, but not all
FT organizations trade in all of these products. Rwanda has the
potential to become a good supplier of top quality coffee, tea,
bananas, fruit juices, and cut flowers.
The FT trading partners purchase the products from
smallholder cooperatives in the producing countries, and sell them
to retailers that agree to put the products on their shelves under
true labeling and at special prices. Trading partners invest in
developing the image of their products, and the market niches where
the required price for value can be obtained.
In 1997, the national FT federations established
“FLO International” with headquarters in Bonn, Germany.
FLO sets standards which must be met by producers to obtain the
internationally recognized FLO certification of the produce. Independent
officers recruited by FLO provide a transparent certification of
the products marketed under true labeling by FLO members’
and by their registered trading companies. The certification concerns
four main tasks:
a) |
assessing the conformity of FT labeled
products to the Fairtrade quality standards; |
b) |
assuring that Fairtrade benefits are used
for social and economic development of the producers; |
c) |
auditing FLO registered traders in order
to make sure that the Fairtrade price is actually paid to
producers; and |
d) |
assuring that the FT labels are only used
on products from Fairtrade certified producers. |
As an indication of the impact of the innovative
marketing system of the FT organizations, the following table shows
the breakdown of the price of a pack of coffee of 250 gr. marketed
by the traditional system as compared with one marketed under the
Fair Trade system (figures in Euro, average 2001 data).
Table 2
| Traditional marketing system |
Fair Trade marketing system |
| |
|
|
|
| Consumers prices (supermarket) |
1.83-3.04 |
Consumers prices (supermarket) |
2.29-3.35 |
| |
|
|
|
| Import charges, cost of roasting
packing and distribution |
1.37-2.58 |
Import charges, cost of roasting
packing and distribution |
1.31-2.38 |
| |
|
FT label fee |
0.05 |
| Export charges |
0.15 |
Export charges |
0.15 |
| Intermediaries |
0.18 |
|
|
| |
|
Cost of cooperative operations |
0.09 |
| Producers price |
0.18 |
Producers price |
0.69 |
Source: Max Havelaar - France
In these markets niche, Rwanda faces the competition
of other well established producers, and, with respect to coffee,
must overcome the poor reputation surrounding the quality of its
produce. This requires a two pronged action: one prong is the need
to improve the quality of the products from the way it is grown
and harvested to the way it is processed. The other is the need
to develop effective marketing techniques, and the international
trading relationships required to sell in the specialty markets
or to traders interested in buying the best of the only slightly
inferior qualities. That is, to transform a commodity into a product,
with its specific characteristics, sold to the extent possible under
internationally recognized labels that certify quality and origin.
|