|
Objectives
The main objective is to increase livestock production and
livestock-derived incomes in the family-farm sector based on programme-induced
improvements in animal health and productivity sustained by a better service
environment.
Activities

At appraisal, it was intended that programme activities
should include:
- Livestock research and extension
- The development of the material and organizational capacity of smallholders
through support for the community organization of basic livestock services
- The development of the capacity of the government to deliver animal-health
services and control disease
- The management and coordination of livestock-sector services.
After it was reviewed in March 2000 (see The
Institutional Context), the programme's activities were reformulated
to include revised components in:
- Institutional strengthening and development
- Rural extension, combining the previous components related to community
capacity and extension
- Livestock disease control, focusing on vaccine production and hygiene
- Support for research into farming systems.
Outcome
The programme is ongoing. So far, programme support has
resulted in the development of a locally produced vaccine for Newcastle
Disease. The pilot field-testing has proven the safety of the vaccine
and defined the number of vaccinations required to establish and maintain
immunity, as well as the best method of vaccine administration.
Organizations
and people
| The principal
factors inhibiting the effective delivery of livestock services
to smallholders in Mozambique include governmental budgetary limitations,
public-sector domination of the delivery of veterinary services
and inputs and poor management. The programme was therefore designed
to strengthen existing institutional structures and develop technical
capacity. |
| Planned
|
|
Achieved
|
| To establish improved
management and control strategies within the administration and
management departments of the National Directorate of Livestock.
To form a unified extension system (UES) from the
existing extension service of the National Directorate of Rural
Extension and to provide international and national technical assistance
to plan extension activities, formulate guidelines and build training
capacity.
To support the introduction of the UES in the four
pilot provinces of Gaza, Manica, Tete and Nampula through the provision
of technical assistance, transport and the training of field staff
in extension methodologies, planning and monitoring. Staff were
to be assigned from the provincial livestock services to assist
extension teams.
To support the development of community-based livestock
services and demonstration projects through the establishment of
a community development fund. The programme was to provide international
technical assistance to prepare guidelines and procedures for the
promotion of community-based self-help projects, farmers' groups
and gender-related activities.
To provide support to conduct a study of the contribution
of the livestock sector to poverty alleviation. |
|
In May 2000, programme
management was absorbed into the administrative structure of the
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
National and international staff were recruited to
fill positions in extension training and extension planning. Provincial
economists were also recruited. However, it was determined that
recruitment had been conducted in an inappropriate manner and that
terms of reference were inconsistent with the skills and proper
roles of staff. Three international study tours and courses on extension
took place in Swaziland, Botswana and Kenya.
A number of UES training activities have taken place
in the four provinces, including awareness workshops, a post-harvest
crop conservation course, a demonstration of locally produced mineral
blocks and training in fodder-bank preparation, communication skills,
improved crushpen construction and the importance of poultry housing.
No community capacity-building activities have taken
place due to the absence of guidelines for the operation of provincial
community development funds and the fact that the operation of these
funds is dependent on the full establishment and operation of the
UES.
This activity was added at the time of the 2000 review,
and no information is yet available on its implementation. |
Herd improvement
| Although the
agricultural research strategy for Mozambique identified high-priority
research areas that could increase livestock production and household
income, it was found that it did not reflect an understanding of
livestock production systems and their interrelationships with other
agricultural production systems. It was also considered inadequate
in its treatment of economic, social and environmental criteria.
The programme therefore set out to strengthen livestock research
by supporting the collection of detailed baseline information and
needs analysis through participatory and consultative processes
and farming systems research (FSR) methodologies. |
| Planned
|
|
Activities
|
| To establish zonal FSR
teams and a national FSR team and provide training and funds to
enable the FSR teams to perform effective investigations into agricultural
and livestock practices, with the participation of farmers. The
programme also intended to strengthen the livestock research capability
of two FSR teams in order to facilitate the collection of baseline
information on production systems and disease.
To appoint an international specialist in FSR to advise
and facilitate the establishment, planning, implementation and evaluation
of participatory research and development using FSR methodologies
and approaches.
To establish a family livestock production systems
research fund. |
|
FSR training has been
supplied, and equipment has been provided.
An international specialist in FSR was appointed in
February 2000, and an in-country FSR introductory course was conducted.
A Competitive Agricultural Research Grant Office was
established within the National Agricultural Research Council to
manage the research fund. The fund has supported four research activities
concerning the impact of productivity factors on livestock management,
helmintoses in small ruminants, African swine fever and brucella
melitensis. |
Animal
health
| Disease outbreaks
have been a major constraint on the livestock subsector in Mozambique.
The main diseases include Newcastle Disease, African swine fever,
ticks and tick-borne diseases and trypanosomiasis. The Government
has in the past endeavoured to control diseases through vaccination
and dipping. The delivery of effective and efficient services to
the livestock subsector is, however, constrained by budget limitations,
the shortage of skilled animal health staff, limited institutional
capacity for research and inadequate information on which to base
animal health and disease-control programmes. |
| Planned
|
|
Achieved
|
| To establish an Epidemiological
Data Collection and Management Unit (EU) within the National Directorate
of Livestock and to provide support facilities. Following the 2000
review, EU activities were refocused, so that the EU would address
constraints relating to small ruminants and poultry, in addition
to large ruminants. The programme was to support the EU in performing
studies of rabies, Newcastle Disease, foot and mouth disease, brucellosis
and tuberculosis and to provide vaccines, chemicals, sprays and
drugs for disease control. Acaricides would be purchased from private
local sources under a cost-recovery programme.
To support the free vaccination programme for the
control of anthrax, blackquarter and foot and mouth disease and
the provision of vaccines, a cold chain for vaccine distribution
and storage and trypanocidal drugs.
To support the Newcastle Disease vaccination development
programme through the provision of training, equipment, an egg-production
flock and embryonated eggs. International and national technical
assistance was to be supplied in poultry husbandry and the costs
and benefits of vaccine production. The programme was also to assist
in the development of extension material related to vaccination
and poultry production and the establishment and training of village
vaccinators.
To support the Institute of Veterinary Research in
conducting research aimed at the control and surveillance of tick-borne,
reproductive and poultry diseases. Activities would include epidemiological
studies and monitoring, improvements in acaricide testing and assessment
of tick resistance to acaricides.
To support training and the provision of technical
advice on local disease control and eradication techniques.
To enhance the veterinary inspection of animals and
animal products for human consumption.
To facilitate legal reform and the liberalization
of veterinary services through the recruitment of a legal consultant
in animal health and in veterinary pharmaceuticals to prepare suitable
legislation applicable to the livestock sector. |
|
The EU has been established,
equipped and staffed with two veterinarians under the supervision
of an epidemiologist. A consultant epidemiologist has been recruited
to develop the unit and direct the initial work. The EU has been
provided with transport facilities and office equipment. Staff within
the unit have received training, including a two-month course in
epidemiology at the University of Reading and a training visit in
1999 to investigate national epidemiology systems in Zambia and
Zimbabwe.
No vaccines or equipment had been provided by the
time of the 2000 review.
A vaccine for Newcastle Disease (I-2) has been developed,
tested and validated for use in small flocks in Mozambique. Although
it is ready for mass production and use, there are a number of problems
with its manufacture. The distribution of the vaccine has so far
been limited to the pilot projects in three provinces. Tests to
discover the most appropriate distribution, administration and cost-recovery
system have commenced, and the preparation of extension material
for the vaccination programme has begun. In collaboration with the
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, the programme
funded the recruitment of a sociologist and an economist to assist
in designing surveys which have been used to gather information
on the production and productivity of village poultry in selected
districts in four provinces. Field trials of the vaccine in 1999
helped to establish the number of vaccinations required per bird
and the best method of vaccination. Since then, follow-up vaccinator
training and regular use of the I-2 vaccine have commenced in the
trial area.
Studies were conducted into water-buffalo mortality
and tick-borne diseases. A sero-survey of cattle for Rift Valley
Fever has been identified as a future priority.
The provincial livestock services from four provinces
participated in a study tour to Zambia in 1998. All field-team staff
received training in the identification and treatment of trypanosomes
and tsetse flies and in the organization and management of campsites.
Courses on tick and tick-borne diseases were held in Maputo for
provincial animal health staff, and a course in South Africa on
tick identification was provided to provincial veterinarians in
1999.
No activities related to public health and hygiene
have yet taken place, although staff from each province have been
trained in meat inspection in Botswana.
No information is yet available on the legal reform
component. |
Lessons learned
The successful implementation of programme activities requires
an effective central management system with competent staff, a strong
institutional position and a clear and definite strategy.
In order to ensure effective targeting of the family sector,
there is an increasing need to focus on small livestock, which are owned
by a high proportion of the rural population.
It is necessary to develop and reformulate animal-health
programmes on a sound epidemiological basis.
The institutional context
The Agricultural Sector Public Expenditure Programme- PROAGRI,
which commenced in January 1999 and within which the programme falls,
represents the totality of the agricultural sector public expenditure
managed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. The overall
goal of PROAGRI is to help secure an appropriate enabling edifice for
sustainable and equitable growth in the agricultural sector so as to reduce
poverty and improve household food security, while protecting the physical
and social environment.
From the start, the programme was designed not only to pursue
the general sectoral objectives of PROAGRI, but also as an integral element
of PROAGRI. It aimed on the one hand to support the development and subsequent
establishment of PROAGRI and on the other to assist the Government of
Mozambique to fulfil its operational mandate for the livestock sector
and to benefit from initiatives in other PROAGRI components (for example,
extension and research) as they entered the implementation phase. The
eventual transfer of the programme under the wing of PROAGRI was thus
explicitly anticipated.
By 1999, it had become apparent that the programme was not
succeeding in supporting the development and establishment of PROAGRI;
on the contrary, it was facing a number of implementation difficulties,
which were compounded by the concurrent development of PROAGRI and the
establishment of new systems, processes and institutions for the management
of the sector. As a result, in March-April 2000 a joint review of the
programme by the Government of Mozambique, IFAD and the United Nations
Office for Project Services was undertaken in order to assess progress
in implementation - given the principles and evolving structures, processes
and procedures of PROAGRI - and to make recommendations on how the programme
could best support PROAGRI and thereby make a more effective contribution
to improving the livelihood of livestock producer families.
The review recommended a number of modifications in the
design of PROAGRI-FSLDP. These aimed at realigning strategic priorities,
activities and implementation processes so as to ensure that the programme
investments actively supported the implementation of PROAGRI, complied
with the basic principles of PROAGRI and assisted in the achievement of
the goals of PROAGRI. Among the main elements of the changes were an increase
in the level of support for the development of PROAGRI implementation
mechanisms and systems and direct support for the establishment of efficient
financial management and services in the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development, with a view to channelling eventually the PROAGRI-FSLSP investment
through the Common Flow of Funds Mechanism.
Associated with the adoption of these strategies were changes
in the activities supported by the programme, a restructuring of management
responsibilities and a reorganization of the components so that PROAGRI-FSLDP
investment reflected the four relevant PROAGRI components (institutional
development, livestock, rural extension and research). The programme's
adjusted annual budget and plan of work would reflect the activities and
proposed expenditures within the PROAGRI Plano Annual de Actividades e
Orcamento/Annual Work Plan and Budget (PAAOs/AWPB) at the provincial and
subsectoral levels.
Since 2000, the restructuring of PROAGRI-FSLDP has gradually
been taking place, and the programme is now more clearly an integral element
within PROAGRI than was formally the case. However, IFAD funding remains
tied to specific PROAGRI sub-components, activities and sub-activities,
rather than to the larger components of which they are a part, while this
ensures that IFAD does not finance the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development (MADER) expenditure on goods and services which IFAD and the
United Nations Office for Project Services consider inappropriate, this
does not prevent these expenditures from being incurred under the broader
PROAGRI.
|
| Project information |
Total cost: USD 25.7 million. Livestock cost
(as a percentage of total): 85%. Duration: The programme was approved
on 4 December 1996 and is ongoing.
Beneficiaries: The programme is national in scope, targeting 109 080 poor
smallholder farm families. Of these, it was estimated that approximately
10 000 families would benefit directly from the programme. |
| References |
Formulation Report on the Family Sector Livestock Development
Programme, June 1996.
United Nations Office for Project Services, Supervision
Mission Report, April/May 1999.
Interim Review Report, Volumes I and II, June 2000.
Back-to-Office Report, April 2000. |
|
|