|
Objectives
Phase I of SFDP was designed to assist small farmers and
the landless rural poor in increasing their incomes and standards of living,
and to promote self-help and self-reliance through:
- building up the institutional base for organizing the disadvantaged
rural poor into small-farmer groups around common economic activities
and/or production resources;
- providing supervised credit to enable these groups to undertake a
range of income-generating activities; and
- providing training and technical assistance to ensure effective utilization
of facilities provided by the project.
Phase II was designed to intensify and expand the activities
of Phase I.
Activities
The
main components under Phase I of the project were of three types:
- Provision of credit for livestock-related economic activities.
The project was to extend credit lines through the Agricultural Development
Bank of Nepal (ADBN) to small farmer groups or individual small farmers
within the small-farmer groups for the purchase of milk buffalo, buffalo
heifers, bullocks and bullock carts, goats, sheep and sows.
- Provision of training for small farmers and small farmer
groups. Training was to be provided in areas such as planning
group activities, bookkeeping, livestock development and agro-processing
activities.
- Provision of technical assistance for institutional capacity-building.
A livestock-insurance specialist was to spend three person-months examining
the viability and assisting in the establishment of a livestock-insurance
scheme.
- Phase II of the project consisted of two main components:
- Provision of credit for livestock production. Credit
was to be provided to improve the productivity of buffalo and goats
and, in the case of farmers with very little or no land, for animals
to hire out for draught and transportation.
- Provision of technical assistance for institutional capacity-building.
The project was to support training, establishment of subproject offices
and formation of small-farmer groups.
Outcome
Phase I
Significant numbers of small farmers were provided with
access to institutional credit; disbursement of credit for livestock activities
exceeded targets by 21%. A study carried out by the Agricultural Projects
Service Centre indicates that income from livestock rose considerably
in some project areas as a result of increased sales of milk and milk
products. One of the factors that played a role in raising market demand
was the restriction of imports of subsidized powdered milk from the European
Union, which created new incentives and improved prices for Nepalese milk
producers. The consequent establishment of a milk-collection system through
the state-owned Dairy Development Corporation improved farmers
market access and linked them to urban milk consumers.
Project credit provided beneficiaries with the opportunity
to take advantage of rising market demand. Draught bullocks purchased
under the project gave beneficiaries flexibility at land-preparation times
and allowed timely planting of crops. Other beneficiaries were able to
upgrade their transport businesses by acquiring bullock carts with rubber
tyres and superior load-carrying capacity.
A significant unplanned achievement was the participation
of poor rural women in development activities through the creation of
womens groups. These groups enhanced womens roles and status
by increasing their incomes and economic independence.
Phase II
The project was successful in providing financial assistance
to small-farmer group members and in encouraging them to save. The introduction
of income criteria for credit eligibility paved the way for the inclusion
of landless labourers and village artisans as members of small-farmer
groups. About 40% of the credit was allocated to livestock, but credit
was not associated with sustained adoption of improved livestock breeds,
as intended at appraisal. Moreover, feed and fodder management did not
improve over the project period.
The womens group organizers were a significant factor
in increasing womens involvement in the project. The most common
purpose of loans to women was livestock rearing, which accounted for 37%
of the total. A common economic activity undertaken by women was the breeding
of goats, buffalo, poultry and pigs.
Organizations
and people
| Government agencies
involved in the delivery of services to livestock producers in Nepal
were found to be generally weak. The Department of Agriculture and
the Department of Livestock Development and Health suffered from
inadequate numbers of staff and inadequate training. Field staff
and extension services had few incentives. Such limitations handicapped
the ability of these agencies to support livestock development. |
| Planned |
|
Achieved |
| To form small-farmer groups and recruit project
support staff, including group organizers and assistant group organizers.
The strategy involved organizing small farmers and landless labourers
into groups based on common economic activities and production resources
so that they could benefit from the larger scale of operations and
access to credit. Under Phase II, 5 810 small-farmer groups with
a total of 58 100 members were to be formed, 200 subproject offices
were to be established and staffed and 30 womens group organizers
were to be recruited.
To establish four regional training centres and provide training
including livestock development for small-farmer group members,
group organizers, assistant group organizers and womens group
organizers. In Phase II, five regional training centres were to
be constructed or rehabilitated.
|
|
By 1989, 4 667 small-farmer groups
with 42 345 members had been formed. By the end of Phase II, 6 954
groups with more than 47 455 members had been formed. At project
completion, 323 ADBN staff had been selected and trained as group
organizers. Although not provided for at Phase I appraisal, 532
womens groups with 4 271 members were formed and received
training in goat and buffalo husbandry. By 1991, 89 womens
group organizers had been recruited and 1 978 womens groups
had been formed, with 16 351 members.
The four regional training centres were established
at Letang, Biratnagar, Anandaban and Napalganj; 30 176 beneficiaries
received training in 42 subjects including group concepts, group
savings and livestock development. Under Phase II, 594 group organizers
or assistants and 257 womens group organizers received training;
5 043 beneficiaries participated in workshops/seminars on livestock
development; 6 257 completed training in agricultural and livestock
development and 4 384 in organization and management of small-farmer
groups. In Phase II, five rural training centres were established
in Morang, Banke, Kailali, Rupandeli and Chitwan.
|
Risk
management
Buffalo raising is associated with high
risks and high initial costs. A possible solution was to establish
a livestock-insurance scheme, with the aim of protecting small farmers
against the risks. |
Planned |
|
Achieved |
| To support a feasibility study into
the proposed livestock-insurance scheme and launch it on a pilot
basis in eight subproject offices.
To facilitate establishment of a group savings scheme
with the objective of making small-farmer group members self-reliant.
|
|
Consultants hired to carry out the
feasibility study and develop a livestock-insurance scheme recommended
a group scheme based on a 10% premium. At project completion, the
scheme was under trial at Mahendranager, where it was popular and
livestock mortality had been checked.
The group savings scheme grew from NPR 4.5 million
in 1986-1987 to NPR 14.5 million at the end of 1991.
|
Access
to inputs and infrastructure
One of the weaknesses in the Nepalese
development process was lack of institutional arrangements for delivering
services. This is exemplified by the inadequacy of credit for small
farmers. Most agricultural credit for small farmers provided by
financial institutions actually goes to large farmers. Nepal lacks
the institutional infrastructure for delivery of the credit services
needed to boost farmers production and incomes. High initial
costs mean that small farmers cannot afford to purchase a pair of
bullocks out of their own resources.
In Phase II, the livestock component targeted only
those districts that had the potential for livestock production,
including support services and access to stable markets. Applicants
for livestock credit were required to follow guidelines and undergo
training. They were encouraged to plant fodder trees and grow forage.
Only animals certified as being in good health could be purchased.
Preconditions for granting loans for livestock development included:
- possession of fundamental livestock-management skills;
- adequate on-farm feed resources and agreement to develop these
further; and
- contribution to a small-farmer group emergency fund to underwrite
loss of buffalo.
|
| Planned |
|
Achieved |
To provide loans for activities identified by groups
and their members on a group guarantee basis requiring no other
collateral or security. In cases of default by one member, the group
was to be collectively responsible; no further loans would be advanced
until the default was remedied. Part of the income generated by
the group was to be transferred to a group savings fund to provide
for members consumption loans, or other purposes according
to group decisions, reducing dependence on private borrowing at
high rates.
In Phase I, to provide credit to purchase:
- 4 800 milk buffalo of local breeds;
- 300 pairs of buffalo heifers;
- 3 700 goat units of four does and one buck (18 500 animals);
- 1 400 sheep units of five sheep each (7 000 animals);
- 300 sows;
- 3 000 bullocks for farmers in the Hills and 4 600 bullocks
in the Terai; and
- 500 bullock carts.
In Phase II, to provide credit to purchase:
- 8 380 buffalo; and
- 10 424 goats.
|
|
Group solidarity was weakened by the banks
demand for individual collateral in addition to the group guarantee.
Repayment became problematic, because group liability was not introduced
and groups did not impose enough social pressure for repayment.
Under Phase I, farmers were able to purchase:
- 8 318 milk buffalo;
- 3 174 buffalo heifers;
- 16 691 goats;
- 1 845 sheep;
- 3 983 pigs;
- 13 281 pairs of draft bullocks; and
- 1 241 bullock carts.
Lack of extension and training compromised productivity,
however. As pig raising was a relatively new activity in Nepal,
small farmers had little understanding of housing, feeding and husbandry
requirements; the advice they received was generally poor. Among
the smallest farmers, introduction mortalities for milk buffalo
were about 10-15%; of the buffalo purchased, 10-15% failed to get
back in calf and 20-25% contracted mastitis. In some cases, buffalo
were provided in areas with underdeveloped milk markets and low
milk prices, making credit repayment difficult.
Under Phase II, farmers were able to purchase:
- 18 679 buffalo; and
- 39 705 goats.
|
Lessons learned
- It is important to provide small farmers with adequate training and
extension services in livestock production. They must have full access
to feed resources and animal health services and should possess adequate
experience in animal husbandry. Limitations in these areas result in
high mortality rates and low productivity.
- Buffalo milk-cows are a risky investment for poor small farmers because
of high maintenance requirements. Considerable proportions of farm resources
in terms of labour, fodder production and finance are required to maintain
the buffalo at productive levels sufficient to allow repayment of credit.
If milk prices are not high enough to give an adequate return, or animals
die, contract serious diseases or do not get back in calf, milk buffalo
are a non-viable investment.
- The introduction of improved exotic breeds in areas where veterinary
services are limited or non-existent is likely to result in high mortality
because of inability to adapt to local feed and disease conditions.
- Any large increase in numbers of livestock that depend on forest
and public lands for fodder will require careful monitoring to control
environmental degradation.
- For the small farmer undertaking new activities with the help of
credit, risk is reduced through emphasis on training and extension activities.
- Promotion of individual investment as opposed to group investment
around common activities or production resources may hamper development
of a spirit of collective self-reliance.
- Broad credit eligibility criteria may compromise an intended focus
on small farmers, weakening group cohesion and reducing the benefits
gained by the poorest farmers.
- Poor farmers may be reluctant to accept responsibility for their
group members debts. Sound assessment of the credit-worthiness
of borrowers is an essential component in extending credit to the poor
on a sustainable basis.
- Timely loan repayment depends on a sufficient number of project staff
with adequate resources performing regular field visits and monitoring
defaulters.
|
| Project information |
Total cost: USD 16.1 million (Phase I) and USD24.4 million
(Phase II). Livestock cost (as percentage of total): N/a.
Duration: The first phase of the project was to be implemented
over a period of five years from 1981 to 1986. The second phase started
in 1986 and was closed in 1992.
Area: Phase I of the project was located in 31 of the 75
districts of Nepal, 19 in the Hill region and 12 in the Terai region plains.
In Phase II, the project area was extended to include a further 12 districts.
Beneficiaries: Phase I of the Small Farmer Development Project (SFDP)
aimed to target about 50 000 small-farmer households; Phase II was to
benefit about 58 100 small-farmer households. In Phase I, farmers with
smallholdings and high incomes were eligible for credit under the project.
The SFDP Phase II eligibility criteria were based on per capita income
in order to overcome limitations connected with coverage in Phase I.
|
| References |
- Project Appraisal Report, First Phase, October 1980.
- Report and Recommendation of the President to the Executive Board,
Phase I, December 1980.
- Mid-Term Evaluation Report, First Phase, April 1984.
- Project Completion Report, First Phase, September 1988, Asian Development
Bank.
- IFAD Project Completion Evaluation Report, Phase I, March 1989.
- Report and Recommendation of the President to the Executive Board,
Phase II. April 1985.
- Project Appraisal Report, Phase II, October 1984.
- Project Completion Report, Phase II, Agricultural Finance Corporation
Ltd. December 1991.
- Project Completion Report, Phase II, July 1992, Asian Development
Bank
- IFAD Completion Evaluation Report - Main Report and Annexes, December
1993
|
|
|