|
Objectives
The main objective of the project is to bring about significant
increases in the income levels of herders, local artisans and small entrepreneurs.
Activities
Project activities were to include:
- support for and strengthening of small producers organizations
to promote technology transfer and adoption, and to facilitate access
to needed financial resources;
- encouraging the adoption of proven technologies;
- developing financial mechanisms to improve and capitalize on existing
production systems;
- strengthening internal and external marketing systems;
- creating links among small herders and microentrepreneurs (urban
and rural) and providing technical and financial support for action
aimed at improving the marketing of meat, pelts, furs and other subproducts;
- promoting more rational use of the agro-ecological and productive
resource base, thereby contributing to improved environmental conditions;
and
- supporting the participation of rural women in production, marketing
and handicrafts activities.
Outcome
The project got off to a slow start. High staff turnover
and problems in project management affected project implementation. The
project started in 1996 and its activities were revised in 2001
after the Mid-Term Evalution. Project approach was changed to focus mainly
on marketing systems for camelid products.
The project has succeeded in promoting llama meat consumption
especially in higher social groups. Dried meat markets have been developed
and micro-enterprises created for dried meat production. Hides consumption
and use has been increased and hide markets have been created. Project
has supported the development of llama fiber use throughout the process
until the final product. A comprehensive database about camelids and camelid
producers has been created by the project.
Access
to inputs and infrastructure
| Difficulties
in achieving a balanced level of development in the project area
are further aggravated by a lack of financial resources. This
situation hampers investments in the area and holds up the adoption
of appropriate technology. |
| Planned |
|
Achieved
|
| Provide multi-purpose
credit and loans for production, microenterprises and marketing,
and create community revolving funds and a guarantee fund.
|
|
16 503 families received
credit. Credit has been distributed through Rotating Fund and
Micro Credit Fund. Rotating Fund provides credit without interest
to registered associations. Credit Fund gives loans to individuals
and groups through private small banks. Through the credit component,
women increased their participation in the production process,
thereby gaining self-esteem and receiving more recognition of
their role in society. |
Organizations
and people
| In the
project area, there is a complete lack of livestock production
support services in terms of training, TA, technology transfer,
veterinary services, organizations, etc. This has led to the
stagnation of traditional production activities, and stymied
the introduction of new technologies or adaptation to new market
opportunities. |
| Planned |
|
Achieved |
| Transfer proven technologies
(related to community and farmer issues, accounting, administrative
management, animal health, pasture improvement, animal nutrition,
fibre collection and transformation and marketing) at a relatively
low cost.
Strengthen local herder organizations. |
|
Some technology transfer
has been undertaken.
Coordination was developed among institutions
and individuals concerned with camelid keeping, including development
programmes, government institutions, universities, producer
associations, traders, processors, non-governmental organizations
(NGOs), individual producers and other organizations. |
Risk
management
| In 1996,
there was a total absence of institutions to support the marketing
of agricultural and livestock products. The traditional market
is characterized by the presence of several intermediaries and
a lack of infrastructure. The most frequently used products,
with potential for internal and external marketing, are meat,
leather and fibers. |
| Planned
|
|
Achieved
|
| Identify quality standards
and market opportunities for camelid meat, fiber and leather,
and define marketing constraints.
Design association structures to maximize producers
economic returns. Calculate supply and demand and develop a
feedback system for producers, producer organizations and market
operators. Identify business opportunities for camelid producers,
and create market channels. Provide international TA to further
the development of international markets, facilitate cooperation
among producers and improve product presentation.
|
|
Quality standards
regulating the market for llama meat and fibre have been implemented.
Training in fibre classification improved the capacity, of women
in particular, to select better-quality fibre for the market.
Rural enterprises producing fibre were consolidated and 25
hides and leather processing units were supported by the project.
Meat-sales points were created in Oruro market in 1995-96, and
similar structures were proposed in Potosi. However, due to
management difficulties, only one of the four planned meat-sales
points functioned properly, and activities were halted.
Several slaughter places in the open air were created to demonstrate
slaughtering techniques.
|
Range
management
| The camelids
are kept in a cold and arid ecosystem, with temperatures as
low as 12°C and an annual rainfall of 250mm. The lack of
forage (linked to poor soil availability) is the main factor
contributing to limited camelid production. In most regions,
there is evidence of serious degradation caused by overgrazing
and the forage has low nutrient levels. Between June and November,
it is not possible to cover the maintenance requirements for
livestock. Therefore, many animals are sold off at low prices
regardless of their condition or category. The main objective
is to sell them off before they die of starvation or serious
malnutrition. Poor nutrition obviously results in poor resistance
to disease, low fertility (42%) and a high mortality rate, especially
among young animals (20%). |
| Planned |
|
Achieved |
| Improve camelid production
and productivity levels by promoting the protection of natural
resources and use of primary technology appropriate to the region
and the capacity of producers. Encourage rational livestock
management in the project area.
Improve pasture by means of fencing, water-capture systems
and irrigation; increase the recuperative capacity of the bofedales
(saturated-soil pasture lands) to boost carrying capacity. By
means of fencing, grazing areas would be set aside to grow reserve
forage for critical periods, thus reducing overgrazing, erosion
and nutritional deficiency among livestock.
Introduce pasture irrigation in order to improve the nutrition
of pregnant animals and of females before servicing.
|
|
An awareness campaign
aimed at producers encouraged the more rational use of production
resources with a view to preserving the environment.
Support was provided for the recuperation of 60 ha of natural
pasture in four areas of La Paz and Oruro, and the bofedales
were expanded. In two communities of Oruro, a study discouraged
the use of traditional forages.
Irrigation was not introduced.
|
Herd Improvement
| Camelids
have a high productive capacity under the difficult environment
conditions typical of the high Andean zones, which allows them
to take advantage of the scarce, poor resources available. However,
the high percentage of consanguinity (inbreeding) creates serious
problems among local herds, as demonstrated by the many cases
of genetic anomalies such as prognatism, polidactily, respiratory
problems, etc., which have a direct bearing on birth rates,
high death rates among young animals and serious problems related
to the productive cycle. |
| Planned |
|
Achieved |
|
Provide training and
TA in all aspects of camelid breeding; and promote genetic improvement
of livestock by selecting animals with desirable characteristics
and exchanging breeding animals. |
|
Six genetic improvement
centres were established, each with an average of 200 selected
animals. However, the centres turned out to be generally ineffective,
mainly due to poor management and lack of effective training
on camelid genetic improvement. |
Animal
health
| The lack
of support for livestock production (veterinary service, livestock
extension, livestock producer organizations) contributes to
low production and productivity levels, a marked degree of consanguinity,
and little productive specialization of camelid herds. The livestock
producers long experience and knowledge of camelid husbandry
is not sufficient to respond to current marketing and quality
needs.
Although the South-American domestic camelid is a resistant
and hardy species, poor feed and lack of veterinary treatment
leads to problems of morbidity, mortality and poor production.
Sarcocystosis is one of the main health problems in camelids
in the project area.
|
| Planned |
|
Achieved |
| Improve animal health
practices. |
|
Project funded two
studies on Sarcocystosis. The other one looked at the economical
importance of the disease and the other study was about the
prevalence of the disease. |
Lessons learned
- High interest rates and lack of proper collateral (producers do
not have land deeds or durable goods) meant that the camelid products
had limited access to credit. Several rural organizations were unable
to obtain credit since they were not legally constituted.
- During the design phase too wide variety of components were included
to the project. This contributed to weak implementation performance
in the beginning of the project. After the Mid-Term Evaluation the
project approach was changed to be more focused on marketing issues
and many other activities were dropped out. This has had a positive
impact on the overall project performance.
- Training was originally given more quantitative than qualitative
way. A lot of beneficiaries participated to the training sessions
but only very few used the new skills in practice. To make training
more effective the project changed its approach to provide more specific
training to smaller groups based on beneficiaries own proposals.
- Private enterprises need to be closely included to this type of
projects to support the sustainability of activities and markets created
during the project.
- There is a need to design comprehensive programmes to include training
and technology transfer on the productive, processing and marketing
aspects of camelids as a whole and not in terms of individual components.
- Intermediate banks that provide credit to beneficiaries for camelid
production should be provided technical training before starting handing
out money. Training should include the basic economy of camelid production
to enable the banks to estimate, which kinds of activities are likely
being profitable.
- The agro-ecological character and geographic and morphological
characteristics of the highlands are serious limitations on project
design.
- Farmers and livestock producers are eager to manage the project
funds and resources themselves.
- The camelid producers are reluctant to pay for veterinary services
and products, mostly because previous campaigns provided services
and products free-of-charge.
|
| Project information |
Total
project cost: USD 11.30 million, Livestock cost (as percentage of total):
45%
Beneficiaries: The project is expected to benefit 15 000 families of camelid
breeders, artisans and small-scale entrepreneurs, who are among the poorest
segments of the population in Bolivia. Thanks to the project, these families
are expected to increase their incomes significantly and to improve their
productive capacity. Direct project beneficiaries comprise some 12 950
peasant families; the remaining 2 050 families will receive technical
assistance (TA) and credit for commercial/processing activities.
Project area: The project area encompasses a vast zone in the Andean high plateau,
accounting for approximately 140 000 km² in the Pacajes, Pando and
Aroma Provinces of the Department of La Paz; Avaroa-Pagador, Carangas,
Sjama, Litoral, Cabrera, Atahualpa and South Carangas Provinces of the
Department of Oruro; and Frias, Chantaya, North Lipez, Baldivieso, South
Lipez, Quijarro and Campos in the Department of Potosi. Department of
Cochabamba, including Ayopaya, Bolivar, Arqua and Tapacari was added to
the project area after the project appraisal.
|
| References |
Report and Recommendation of the President to the Executive
Board on a Proposed Loan to the Republic of Bolivia (1994).Informe de
la misión de evaluación ex-ante. Informe No. 0505-BO (1994).
Informe de la misión de Análisis: Mid-term
review del Proyecto de desarrollo de criadores de camelidos en el altiplano
andino (BO-354) (1998).
Corporación Andina de Fomento: "Informe de
Misión". Proyecto de desarrollo de criadores de camelidos
en el altiplano andino. UNEPCA (1999).
Informe de la misión de supervisión al
proyecto de desarrollo de criadores de camelidos del altiplano boliviano.
Sistemacion: Experiencia de Fondos Rotatorios Cumminitarios
Proyecto de Dessarollo de Criadores de Camelidos en el Altiplano Andino,
UNEPCA (2002)
Informe de Actividades Gestion 2002 (2003) |
|
|