UCRIDP-PDRCIU

Umutara Community Resource and infrastructure development project

contact site map print  

Français

Home> Interphase Evaluation

 

Evaluation Oct 2004

  • Introduction
  • Changes
  • Evaluation of project
  • lessons learned
  • Design Considerations
  • Strategic Framework
  • Components
  • Implementation
  • Potential Risks
  • Achievements
  •  

    Project

  • Project description
  • Strategic framework
  • Investment components
  • Key documents
  •  

    Informations

  • Acronym and abbreviation
  • Maps
  • Pictures
  • Archive (previous news)
  • The team
  • Download
  •  

     

     

     

     

    Changes since project design

    The project was conceived in 1999/2000 and while some modifications were introduced in the design when the twin project was agreed to, they were minimal and the underlying principles, the investment components and the way of implementing them remained essentially the same. However, there have been considerable changes in the economic, social and institutional landscape in Rwanda over this period.

    · There has been a marked shift away from the emergency relief-oriented operations and associated support from the donor community, characterized by grant assistance and easy access to funds, to development assistance that is prioritizing sustainability and accountability.

    · There was little policy guidance for tackling poverty during project design and as the appraisal report for the first project noted, ‘GOR has not yet elaborated a specific policy aimed at poverty eradication per se.’ With the preparation and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) in late 2000, and its subsequent adoption, the project now has an approved policy framework within which to address the question of rural poverty and support for vulnerable groups in the Province.

    · The Central Bank has introduced a new banking regulation that requires all micro-finance institutions, taking savings and disbursing loans, to comply with strict prudential rules and register with the Central Bank. This throws into question the design of the rural finance component that was based primarily on creation of informal community-level savings and loan associations, which now would come within the new banking regulation and would need to meet the strict registration requirements.

    · Probably the most important change affecting project design is government’s commitment to decentralization. While government’s commitment to decentralization has been in effect for some time, the challenge is now to ensure district authorities take fully their responsibilities and roles, and actively participate in planning, programming and budgeting and take up project execution to ensure ownership.

     

     
    © 2005 - Terms of use

    top