UCRIDP-PDRCIU

Umutara Community Resource and infrastructure development project

contact site map print  

Français

Home> Interphase Evaluation - Implemantation - page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

 

Evaluation Oct 2004

  • Introduction
  • Changes
  • Evaluation of project
  • lessons learned
  • Design Considerations
  • Strategic Framework
  • Components
  • Implementation
  • Potential Risks
  • Achievements
  •  

    Project

  • Project description
  • Strategic framework
  • Investment components
  • Key documents
  •  

    Informations

  • Acronym and abbreviation
  • Maps
  • Pictures
  • Archive (previous news)
  • The team
  • Download
  •  

     

     

    Implementation Arrangements

    Implementation of the Land Sector Strategy

    The implementation of the four sub-components that make up the Land Sector Strategy are discussed in the paragraphs that follow.

    Strengthened Land-Use Planning Capacities at the District and Provincial Levels.  The focus of this sub-component of the Land Sector Strategy would be the development of a Land Information System (LIS). The LIS would combine multiple sources of data from the district, including for example, census data on population, land use information, livestock levels, the location of roads, schools, health posts, information on all project activities and their status and any other relevant information. When combined with the information derived from the community PRA processes, the LIS would provide a powerful basis for planning district investments and for monitoring the performance and impact of these investments. The sub-component will include the following activities:  (i) assessment of information needs and development of a detailed strategy, (ii) establishment of provincial GIS Team and information collection, (iii) training of district planners, and (iv) interim evaluation.

    Land Tenure Security for Poor Rural Households – In Support of Implementation of National Land Policy and New Land Act.  This sub-component would support the development of cell-level maps indicating patterns of land use and the identity of the people and households using individual parcels of land. These maps would serve to identify, record and therefore protect, the land rights of poor and vulnerable households. They would provide a record of who is using which land resources for what purposes in each cell. The maps would help increase the tenure security of agricultural smallholders, could reduce land disputes and could constitute a basis for the subsequent registration of land parcels should it be desired by the smallholder.  The community maps would also constitute a valuable information tool for both district planners, the local land committees and the District Land Commissions, once they are established for they would provide an accurate reference upon which district planners and Land Commissions could develop a strategy for improved land-use planning and, if necessary, land consolidation (as envisaged in the Land Policy). The following activities are envisaged:  (i) assessment of information needs and development of a detailed strategy, (ii) community mapping, (iii) storage and updating of community maps, (iv) training and capacity building of cell, sector and district institutions, (v) interim evaluation and (vi) support to District Land Commissions.

    Land Tenure Safeguards in UCRIDP.  Land tenure issues cross-cut many of the components and activities of the UCRIDP.  Infrastructural investment decisions, such as bore holes or cattle watering points or the location of roads can be affected by land tenure issues such as land disputes and existing rights of access.  The successful integration of land tenure issues into the design and implementation of project activities could both heighten positive impacts and reduce the likelihood that poor men and women would be excluded from the benefits.  The first task would be to identify which activities would most likely be affected by land tenure issues and second, to design appropriate responses. The sub-component will include the following activities:  (i) preliminary assessment, (ii) periodic assessment of land tenure issues in UCRIDP and design of necessary responses, (iii) land tenure integration support activities, (iv) training and capacity building of cell, sector and district institutions and (v) evaluation and supervision.

    Developed and Strengthened Local Land Dispute Resolution Through Support to the National Unity and Reconciliation Council.  In line with the UCRIDP’s overall goal to promote peace and reconciliation and in line with IFAD’s concern to empower the rural poor to overcome their poverty, the Programme would provide support to the National Unity and Reconciliation Council’s efforts to introduce and/or strengthen local land dispute resolution mechanisms.  The sub-component actions foreseen are:  (i) preliminary assessment, (ii) support to local land dispute resolution mechanisms and (iii) interim evaluation. The sub-component would be built on a principle of cost-sharing and progressive reduction in UCRIDP support in order to ensure the future sustainability of the local land dispute resolution mechanisms. It would be expected that early in Phase III the UCRIDP contribution would be able to cease. By the end of Phase III of UCRIDP (2010), districts should be able to implement all aspects of the Strategy deemed important in an autonomous and sustainable manner.  In the meantime, technical and financial responsibilities would take place on a progressive basis during Phase II and Phase III, and would reflect increased capacities, improved performance and growing absorption rates.

     

     
    © 2005 - Terms of use

    top