| Project ID: 1299
Executive Board document:
EB-2005-86-R-29-Rev-1
Integrated Agricultural Development Project in the Governorate of Siliana - Phase II
Who are the beneficiaries? The project area consolidates the areas of investment under the first
phase of the Integrated Agricultural Development Project in the Governorate of Siliana and extends
into areas considered to be relatively poorer. The project would cover all the southern districts of the
governorate and eight subdistricts in the north, bringing the project universe to 27 800 households
(including 12 600 farms). The target group will encompass the following categories: (i) poor landless
households that require state welfare assistance to meet their basic needs; (ii) rural households that
rely on women’s labour in agriculture and men’s seasonal low-skilled employment; and
(iii) households with relatively greater economic security that have access to larger landholdings and
herd sizes and higher skilled employment. Project activities are tailored to service low- and averageincome
households and promote economic complementarities; specifically the increase in valueadded
production among average-income households should stimulate demand for services, the
establishment of new businesses and the generation of employment among the low-income categories.
Why are they poor? The incidence of poverty in the project area is roughly 30%. Geographically,
poverty stems mainly from poor access to services due to physical isolation and the high investment
cost of restoring the productive potential of land suffering from moderate to extreme erosion.
Accordingly, the mountainous southern districts of the project area are relatively poorer. Household
poverty levels are mainly related to the sources of income of the various members who are active in
the workforce and their ability to move into higher-value or more stable employment. Households
with seasonal, low-skilled, poorly remunerated and relatively vulnerable employment (owing to
drought, shifts in public investment, or liberalization in the textile industry) are considered poor.
These households are also characterized by a high school drop-out rate among children after they have
completed the primary level. Poor smallholder households also suffer from low agricultural
productivity, dependency on government subsidies and dependency on public investments for wage
labour opportunities. The young women of poor households are isolated from mainstream
information, sensitization and vocational training services.
What can beneficiaries expect from the project? Focusing on the reliance of local livelihoods on
on-farm and off-farm incomes, the project will seek to boost agricultural productivity, support the
development of small and medium-sized businesses and open up access for young people, especially
women, to the labour market. Mechanisms will be established that assist communities and local
administrations alike in planning and supervising synergistic and targeted activities to foster self-help
and local development initiatives. Under this approach, landless households are likely to benefit from
the project’s infrastructure services and technical support for employment creation, while
smallholders will benefit from the actions to enhance agricultural productivity and environmental
conservation.
Loan amount: SDR 10.9 million (equivalent to
approximately USD 15.5 million)
Total project cost: USD 38.9 million
Project ID: 1213
Executive Board document: EB-2002-76-R-19-REV-1
Agropastoral Development and Local Initiatives Promotion Programme
for the South-East Poverty in Tunisia remains essentially a rural phenomenon. In 1990,
two thirds of the nations poor lived in rural areas. Poverty levels
in rural areas can be as high as 13%, almost twice the national
average of 7%. Poverty is endemic in the south-east as a result
of harsh natural conditions and climatic hazards. Only those who
have built up large herds and capital are able to resist recurrent
droughts. For many decades, the bulk of the population has adopted
survival strategies such as temporary wage labour, other precarious
activities and emigration abroad. Although public investments have
considerably improved infrastructure, water supply, electricity
and other social services, there are still significant pockets of
poverty. Women and youth, in particular, are likely to be poor as
they have no economic autonomy and little access to decision-making.
Small- and medium-scale agropastoralists, who are the most vulnerable
to recurrent droughts, are also among the poorest people in these
areas.
The programme covers the south-eastern part of the country. This
area, which encompasses the Governorate of Tataouine and a large
pastoral community in the Governorate of Kebili, Delegation of Douz,
is sub-arid and arid. Its main potential is extensive pastoralism
and marginal dry-land agriculture, with some scattered recent irrigation.
The programme will affect some 10 000 households (66 000 people)
in Tataouine and 1 000 households in Douz (7 000 people). The villages
hold transhumant land rights over 25 socio-territorial units (STUs),
in addition to two inter-community areas. Those households comprise
a focal group of 6 500 farmer-herders, and 3 500 rural households
that have no significant farming activities (landless). Through
its income-generating and diversification activities, the programme
will address the needs of about 17 000 young rural men and women
who have little access to land and other productive assets.
The programme goes beyond participation, seeking to promote a broad-based
partnership between the people, the state and other operators. While
a number of activities of general concern will be implemented through
public investment and services, the main programme thrust will focus
on activities programmed and implemented on a participatory basis
through territory- and community-based agricultural development
allocations. It is expected that programming and implementation
of about 35% of total investments will be under the direct responsibility
and control of community-based organizations.
Loan amount:
SDR 14.1 million (equivalent to approximately USD 18.7 million)
on ordinary terms.
Total programme costs USD 44.3 million
Cooperating Institution:
United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS)
|