Études et dossiers

This paper seeks to draw on both the positive aspects of current practice and the critiques that have been made, to propose an action plan for strengthening IFAD’s engagement in country level policy dialogue.

It outlines a set of broad principles underpinning IFAD’s approach, the first of which is the reaffirmation that policy engagement must be shaped and led by the CPM.

It also makes specific proposals for more effectively integrating country-level policy dialogue in IFAD country programmes; for improving IFAD’s monitoring, reporting and knowledge management on the subject; and for strengthening in-house capacity for country-level policy dialogue.  

Describes what IFAD and the Policy and Technical Advisory division are supporting country-level policy engagement.

It also summarizes past experience and explains how Country Programme Managers can access funds to engage in country-level policy dialogue.

Le monde d’aujourd’hui est plein de paradoxes, parfois grotesques – ainsi, 870 millions de personnes souffrent de la faim alors qu’un tiers de l’ensemble de la production alimentaire est perdu ou gaspillé. Nous nous émerveillons devant les taux de croissance des pays à revenu intermédiaire; pourtant, des dizaines de millions de personnes y vivent en situation d’extrême pauvreté. Près de 75% des personnes les plus pauvres du monde vivent en milieu rural et tirent principalement leurs moyens d’existence de l’agriculture, tout en produisant plus de 80% de la nourriture consommée en Afrique subsaharienne et en Asie. Et ils
sont nombreux à être eux-mêmes des acheteurs nets de denrées alimentaires.

Brochure illustrating IFAD's support to coffee value-chain development.

Small-scale producers in the development of tea value chain partnerships 

Brochure illustrating IFAD's support to cocoa value-chain development.

The thesis of this article is that governments of countries that plan their agricultural and rural development programmes on a large scale – typically covering the entire agriculture sector and including all or most of the important ingredients for agricultural growth and rural development – do better in terms of agricultural production and reduction of rural poverty and hunger than do country governments that do not invest broadly and at scale in such development.